Kids at more risk in India's second COVID-19 wave Article | No vacicne for children currently | Coronavirus Article
ArticleYeah, so those are excellent question. Let me just say that after having the pandemic with us, over one year, we learn quite a bit about it. And some of those kinds of new discovery are pretty old. In fact, what I mean by that is that we knew already quite early that young people, indeed below the age of 10, are somehow protected from the source from the COVID-19. However, there are still carrier, namely, if we would do the test, like the PCR test, we can still see them as infected. And this really caused some confusion.
Kids ArticleMany people say, kids or children are protected. But that's not the case. They are not getting a severe illness, which is very important. But most important, I think, to know to understand is that kids and children reflecting their surrounding, namely, if their family has disease, they will be a carrier. If for example, in Israel, which as you all know, the situation is really that COVID-19 basically is not there anymore. Children have zero in really, they're not carrier anymore, therefore schools were open, everything was open, and so on. But in places where like in India, or some places in India, where the infection and the pandemic is really hitting hard, our children will keep being carrier. So it's really a reflection more than anything else.
All right, so what? Yes, go ahead.
Yeah. So a lot of people really ask what make children, let's say, below the age of 10, so protected in a sense versus the adult. And there are at least I would say four hypotheses. This one is seems to be really clear that it's something in the biology of the of the children. What I mean by that, it means that somehow their immune system is developing, so that it will be less sensitive to so they have like an extra protection, it could be from two reason. One, which is most people believe that their innate system, they really are the system that they were born with, is by far a better state to compete with pathogen, including their COVID-19.
But the other aspect is that maybe they have less accessible of their receptor, that should be the entry point for the virus to get to the lung. And both a stories are indeed, the case. More important, I think, is the fact that about the infected children, they only have 50% chance to infect other if we compare them to adult. So there are more than one element that makes the children are very different in this aspect, by the way and interesting hypotheses that have very little support, is the fact that there are bacteria, their microbiome, in their guts in their mouth is somewhat different, right, giving higher protection.
Right, the immediate question that arises then is that there is no vaccine that has been approved for use in children. As of now, there was positive news earlier from Pfizer, which declared that it's short is 100% effective, and children aged between 12 to 15 years, should governments across the world give a more serious look at vaccinating the younger population considering these numbers?
Yeah, so that's a very good point. And it's a very, very good result from Pfizer, and probably moderna as well, that those type of vaccine are super effective for children from the age of 12 to 15. Actually, there was no difference between age 12 to 15. So it's a give a good, I would say prediction that probably also younger people would have been a very well responding to the vaccine, or whether in terms of numbers from the population, you know, like a demographic, having another bunch of people like 12 to 15 being vaccinated, really change the, I would say the the progress of the COVID-19. So each chunk in the population that can be in fact, a vaccinated. It's a very good news for the population in general.
please do not enter any spam link in the comment box ConversionConversion EmoticonEmoticon